Comments for it’s all semantics http://semedica.wordpress.com Semantic Strategy Insights for Publishers Mon, 07 May 2012 09:48:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ Comment on What Is an “eBook?” by Bcwxbymx http://semedica.wordpress.com/2010/03/12/what-is-an-%e2%80%9cebook%e2%80%9d/#comment-679 Mon, 07 May 2012 09:48:40 +0000 http://blog.silverchair.com/?p=378#comment-679 I support Manchester United http://ihypehieo.de.tl 15 yo lola pics this is one of my biggest fantasies, my mate has a mum who is unbelievably hot, the things i would do to her….

]]> Comment on What Is an “eBook?” by Hsrmzvlh http://semedica.wordpress.com/2010/03/12/what-is-an-%e2%80%9cebook%e2%80%9d/#comment-678 Fri, 04 May 2012 02:27:46 +0000 http://blog.silverchair.com/?p=378#comment-678 Is this a temporary or permanent position? http://ytedakafia.de.tl presteen models girls its cute how she acts innoctent but a little bad acting great body they needed less talking and more moaning

]]> Comment on What Is an “eBook?” by Uomkdlpz http://semedica.wordpress.com/2010/03/12/what-is-an-%e2%80%9cebook%e2%80%9d/#comment-677 Thu, 03 May 2012 15:23:39 +0000 http://blog.silverchair.com/?p=378#comment-677 What sort of music do you like? http://egubaboroqy.de.tl nymphets magazzine This guys site is such fake bull shit, and now he’s running repeats. This same slut was on here before.

]]> Comment on What Is an “eBook?” by Jouybhcj http://semedica.wordpress.com/2010/03/12/what-is-an-%e2%80%9cebook%e2%80%9d/#comment-676 Thu, 03 May 2012 09:49:09 +0000 http://blog.silverchair.com/?p=378#comment-676 Can you hear me OK? http://oqepuhylinys.de.tl little boobs nymphets holy shit that ass is amazing!!!!!!!!! the thing has a fuckin mind of it own!!!!wvery time she gets whorney her ass probobly goes a-bouncin!!!

]]> Comment on What Is an “eBook?” by Ymuslsnz http://semedica.wordpress.com/2010/03/12/what-is-an-%e2%80%9cebook%e2%80%9d/#comment-675 Thu, 08 Sep 2011 20:04:18 +0000 http://blog.silverchair.com/?p=378#comment-675 Could I have , please? pre teenage nn models
 31165

]]> Comment on Searches for Clinical Trials: We Can Do Better! by luniet http://semedica.wordpress.com/2010/01/26/searches-for-clinical-trials-we-can-do-better/#comment-52 Sun, 29 Aug 2010 04:25:54 +0000 http://blog.silverchair.com/?p=344#comment-52 I hope the system make students easier to search the right journals their looked for.

]]> Comment on Semantic Web Elevator Speech by Oleg Kreymer http://semedica.wordpress.com/2010/05/17/semantic-web-elevator-speech/#comment-46 Tue, 18 May 2010 17:27:06 +0000 http://blog.silverchair.com/?p=429#comment-46 Pam, you are correct in pointing that an XML file by itself is not sufficient to “qualify” as a Semantic Web component. Semantic Web would rely on unambiguous data sets (ontologies, etc) that would be referenced to from within a mark-up (XML-like) document by pointing to external resources (defined by URIs). These documents would no longer be structured hierarchically, like XML, but would have an even flatter structure known as RDF, Resource Description Framework. The idea is that RDF is the true open, Web-scale format able to support Semantic Web needs.

]]> Comment on What Is an “eBook?” by Thane Kerner http://semedica.wordpress.com/2010/03/12/what-is-an-%e2%80%9cebook%e2%80%9d/#comment-41 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 18:06:23 +0000 http://blog.silverchair.com/?p=378#comment-41 Joe Esposito posts a related article at the Scholarly Kitchen:

http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2010/03/29/the-next-e-book-device-is-already-here/

]]> Comment on Searches for Clinical Trials: We Can Do Better! by MTChat http://semedica.wordpress.com/2010/01/26/searches-for-clinical-trials-we-can-do-better/#comment-38 Sun, 21 Feb 2010 20:03:12 +0000 http://blog.silverchair.com/?p=344#comment-38 I’m glad you brought this up…

From the standpoint of researching these terms for medical transcription, the abbreviations, acronyms, and lack of structured terminology make these very difficult to find.

]]> Comment on Quantifying the Obvious by Bennett Graff http://semedica.wordpress.com/2009/10/16/quantifying-the-obvious/#comment-33 Thu, 17 Dec 2009 20:35:47 +0000 http://blog.silverchair.com/?p=239#comment-33 This trend will snowball as vendors–like Silverchair, but numerous others–crop up enabling publishers to go online more easily. Health sciences led the charge in the academic space (the public library space belongs to ProQuest, Gale, Ebsco, and the other non-STM aggregators) because there was frankly the most money in that segment of that market space, with very large players, sufficiently capitalized, like Wolter Kluwer, Elsevier, etc., able to take large swaths of their content digital.

But now vendors have come online–Atypon, Impelsys, Tirza, Pub2Web–which have enabled smaller publishers to digitally platform their content without having to build their own systems. (Note some of the big publishers originally sought to lease space on their systems to other publishers, but that created obvious conflicts of interest.

Libraries are going electronic because more publishers now have available neutral platforms that not only enable them to go digital at reasonable cost but were specifically designed with library licensing, data access and data linking (to library holdings) concerns addressed.

]]>