<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for it’s all semantics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://semedica.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://semedica.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Semantic Strategy Insights for Publishers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 04:25:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Searches for Clinical Trials: We Can Do Better! by luniet</title>
		<link>http://semedica.wordpress.com/2010/01/26/searches-for-clinical-trials-we-can-do-better/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>luniet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 04:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.silverchair.com/?p=344#comment-52</guid>
		<description>I hope the system make students easier to search the right journals their looked for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope the system make students easier to search the right journals their looked for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Is an “eBook?” by sandy</title>
		<link>http://semedica.wordpress.com/2010/03/12/what-is-an-%e2%80%9cebook%e2%80%9d/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>sandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 12:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.silverchair.com/?p=378#comment-51</guid>
		<description>wuCR8m http://fgb7s3Ffjsev7yrbvqqcf7.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wuCR8m <a href="http://fgb7s3Ffjsev7yrbvqqcf7.com" rel="nofollow">http://fgb7s3Ffjsev7yrbvqqcf7.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Semantic Web Elevator Speech by Oleg Kreymer</title>
		<link>http://semedica.wordpress.com/2010/05/17/semantic-web-elevator-speech/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Oleg Kreymer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 17:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.silverchair.com/?p=429#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Pam, you are correct in pointing that an XML file by itself is not sufficient to &quot;qualify&quot; as a Semantic Web component.  Semantic Web would rely on unambiguous data sets (ontologies, etc) that would be referenced to from within a mark-up (XML-like) document by pointing to external resources (defined by URIs).  These documents would no longer be structured hierarchically, like XML, but would have an even flatter structure known as RDF, Resource Description Framework.  The idea is that RDF is the true open, Web-scale format able to support Semantic Web needs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pam, you are correct in pointing that an XML file by itself is not sufficient to &#8220;qualify&#8221; as a Semantic Web component.  Semantic Web would rely on unambiguous data sets (ontologies, etc) that would be referenced to from within a mark-up (XML-like) document by pointing to external resources (defined by URIs).  These documents would no longer be structured hierarchically, like XML, but would have an even flatter structure known as RDF, Resource Description Framework.  The idea is that RDF is the true open, Web-scale format able to support Semantic Web needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Is an “eBook?” by Thane Kerner</title>
		<link>http://semedica.wordpress.com/2010/03/12/what-is-an-%e2%80%9cebook%e2%80%9d/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Thane Kerner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 18:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.silverchair.com/?p=378#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Joe Esposito posts a related article at the Scholarly Kitchen:

http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2010/03/29/the-next-e-book-device-is-already-here/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe Esposito posts a related article at the Scholarly Kitchen:</p>
<p><a href="http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2010/03/29/the-next-e-book-device-is-already-here/" rel="nofollow">http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2010/03/29/the-next-e-book-device-is-already-here/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Searches for Clinical Trials: We Can Do Better! by MTChat</title>
		<link>http://semedica.wordpress.com/2010/01/26/searches-for-clinical-trials-we-can-do-better/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>MTChat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 20:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.silverchair.com/?p=344#comment-38</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad you brought this up...

From the standpoint of researching these terms for medical transcription, the abbreviations, acronyms, and lack of structured terminology make these very difficult to find.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad you brought this up&#8230;</p>
<p>From the standpoint of researching these terms for medical transcription, the abbreviations, acronyms, and lack of structured terminology make these very difficult to find.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quantifying the Obvious by Bennett Graff</title>
		<link>http://semedica.wordpress.com/2009/10/16/quantifying-the-obvious/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Bennett Graff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 20:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.silverchair.com/?p=239#comment-33</guid>
		<description>This trend will snowball as vendors--like Silverchair, but numerous others--crop up enabling publishers to go online more easily.  Health sciences led the charge in the academic space (the public library space belongs to ProQuest, Gale, Ebsco, and the other non-STM aggregators) because there was frankly the most money in that segment of that  market space, with very large players, sufficiently capitalized, like Wolter Kluwer, Elsevier, etc., able to take large swaths of their content digital.

But now vendors have come online--Atypon, Impelsys, Tirza, Pub2Web--which have enabled smaller publishers to digitally platform their content without having to build their own systems.  (Note some of the big publishers originally sought to lease space on their systems to other publishers, but that created obvious conflicts of interest.  

Libraries are going electronic because more publishers now have available neutral platforms that not only enable them to go digital at reasonable cost but were specifically designed with library licensing, data access and  data linking (to library holdings) concerns addressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This trend will snowball as vendors&#8211;like Silverchair, but numerous others&#8211;crop up enabling publishers to go online more easily.  Health sciences led the charge in the academic space (the public library space belongs to ProQuest, Gale, Ebsco, and the other non-STM aggregators) because there was frankly the most money in that segment of that  market space, with very large players, sufficiently capitalized, like Wolter Kluwer, Elsevier, etc., able to take large swaths of their content digital.</p>
<p>But now vendors have come online&#8211;Atypon, Impelsys, Tirza, Pub2Web&#8211;which have enabled smaller publishers to digitally platform their content without having to build their own systems.  (Note some of the big publishers originally sought to lease space on their systems to other publishers, but that created obvious conflicts of interest.  </p>
<p>Libraries are going electronic because more publishers now have available neutral platforms that not only enable them to go digital at reasonable cost but were specifically designed with library licensing, data access and  data linking (to library holdings) concerns addressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quantifying the Obvious by Academia and STM Publishing Have Gone Electronic &#171; The Scholarly Kitchen</title>
		<link>http://semedica.wordpress.com/2009/10/16/quantifying-the-obvious/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Academia and STM Publishing Have Gone Electronic &#171; The Scholarly Kitchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.silverchair.com/?p=239#comment-31</guid>
		<description>[...] It took a lunch discussion to make me aware of a blog post I missed. I was recently enjoying a talk with Silverchair&#8217;s Thane Kerner and hashing over the predicaments of modern scholarly publishing when he started drawing graphs in the air and asked, &#8220;Didn&#8217;t you see my blog post?&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It took a lunch discussion to make me aware of a blog post I missed. I was recently enjoying a talk with Silverchair&#8217;s Thane Kerner and hashing over the predicaments of modern scholarly publishing when he started drawing graphs in the air and asked, &#8220;Didn&#8217;t you see my blog post?&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The SSP &#8220;IN&#8221; Conference by Kent Anderson</title>
		<link>http://semedica.wordpress.com/2009/09/25/the-ssp-in-conference/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.silverchair.com/?p=189#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Thane,

I was seeing the same thing at the meeting -- a desire for synthesis in the unfilled layers bounding our current offerings. Whether these are taxonomic, semantic, social, authoring, citation, mobile solutions remains to be seen. But cut from the confines of current structures, the talent and creativity were apparent and unleashed. If only we could be the creative leaders we aspire to be!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thane,</p>
<p>I was seeing the same thing at the meeting &#8212; a desire for synthesis in the unfilled layers bounding our current offerings. Whether these are taxonomic, semantic, social, authoring, citation, mobile solutions remains to be seen. But cut from the confines of current structures, the talent and creativity were apparent and unleashed. If only we could be the creative leaders we aspire to be!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Welcome to It’s All Semantics by Logo Mats</title>
		<link>http://semedica.wordpress.com/2009/08/03/welcome-to-it%e2%80%99s-all-semantics/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Logo Mats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.silverchair.com/?p=103#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Great blog you have here, found it searching for something else, will check back soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great blog you have here, found it searching for something else, will check back soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The SSP &#8220;IN&#8221; Conference by The SSP “IN” Conference Reviews Robot</title>
		<link>http://semedica.wordpress.com/2009/09/25/the-ssp-in-conference/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>The SSP “IN” Conference Reviews Robot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.silverchair.com/?p=189#comment-10</guid>
		<description>[...] the original post here:  The SSP “IN” Conference          By admin &#124; category: Review? &#124; tags: commercial, conference, management, our-personae, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the original post here:  The SSP “IN” Conference          By admin | category: Review? | tags: commercial, conference, management, our-personae, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>